Self or No-Self? - The Debate about Selflessness and the Sense of Self. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, Conference 2015

Self or No-Self? - The Debate about Selflessness and the Sense of Self. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, Conference 2015

von: Ingolf U. Dalferth, Trevor W. Kimball

Mohr Siebeck , 2018

ISBN: 9783161553554 , 370 Seiten

Format: PDF

Kopierschutz: DRM

Windows PC,Mac OSX Apple iPad, Android Tablet PC's

Preis: 99,00 EUR

Mehr zum Inhalt

Self or No-Self? - The Debate about Selflessness and the Sense of Self. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion, Conference 2015


 

Cover

1

Preface

6

Contents

8

Ingolf U. Dalferth: Introduction: The Debate about Self and Selflessness

12

I. The Making of the Self through Language

18

Ingolf U. Dalferth: Situated Selves in “Webs of Interlocution”: What Can We Learn from Grammar?

20

1. The ‘self ’ as an operator

20

2. The ‘self ’as a noun

21

3. The ‘self ’ as a verb and an adverb

23

3.1 The self as Dasein, Sosein and Wahrsein

23

3.2 The self as the relating of a relation

25

3.3 Relations, distinctions and the actual infinite

28

3.4 The self as activity and mode of relating

29

3.5 Two basic questions

32

4. Self-interpreting animals

33

4.1 Understanding and interpretation

34

4.2 Changing the world by interpreting it

35

4.3 Interpretation and self-interpretation

36

5. Selves and situations

36

5.1 The relativity and selectivity of situations

36

5.2 Shared situations

37

5.3 Re-presenting interpretations

38

6. Self-interpretations

39

7. A sense of self

41

8. A perennial problem

43

9. The ‘self ’ as an orienting device

45

Marlene Block: God, Grammar and the Truing of the Self: A Response to Ingolf Dalferth

48

1. The Utility (or not) of the View from Language

48

2. Reading Ingolf Dalferth Backwards

52

3. Beginning in the Midst of Grammar as Partes Orationis

54

4. Rethinking Language and the Self ‘from the (Indexical) Ground Up’

57

5. Final Thoughts: Theology, Grammar, and the Truing of the Self

60

II. The European Legacy

62

Joseph S. O’Leary: The Self and the One in Plotinus

64

The Autonomy of Soul

66

Elusive Selfhood

69

Does Plotinus Need a Firmer Conception of Self?

72

Overcoming Plotinus’s Metaphysics

75

Conclusion

78

Marcelo Souza: A Question of Continuity: A Response to Joseph S. O’Leary

80

W. Ezekiel Goggin: Selfhood and Sacrifice in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit

86

1. An Instructive Disjunction: Self, Not-Self, and the Limits of Reflection

87

2. Desire and the Sacrificial Structure of Recognition

90

3. Unanticipated Tasks? Some Final Remarks

94

Iben Damgaard: Kierkegaard on Self and Selflessness in Critical Dialogue with MacIntyre’s, Taylor’s and Ricoeur’s Narrative Approach to the Self

98

Introduction

98

1. The Narrative Dimension of Contemporary Hermeneutic Approaches to Selfhood

99

2. Kierkegaard’s Either-Or: To Become Oneself by Choosing Oneself

104

3. Kierkegaard’s Works of Love: To Become Oneself in Selfless Love

117

Closing Words

123

Raymond Perrier: The Grammar of ‘Self ’: Immediacy and Mediation in Either / Or: A Response to Iben Damgaard

124

1. Being a Self

126

2. Being Oneself

130

3. Dénouement

136

III. The Self in Modernity

138

Kate Kirkpatrick: ‘A Perpetually Deceptive Mirage’: Jean-Paul Sartre and Blaise Pascal on the Sinful (No?)Self

140

Introduction

140

1. Sartre’s lacking-self

141

2. Pascal on the self

145

3. Self or No-Self?

151

Eleonora Mingarelli: "It is no longer I who lives..." William James and the Process of De-selving

154

I. Breaking Through Continuity

154

1. The Teleological Mind

157

2. The Religious Self: Interest In Varieties

159

3. The Informative Self and The Process of De-Selving

164

Stephanie Gehring: After the Will: Attention and Selfhood in Simone Weil

170

Introduction

170

1. On Saying “I”

171

1.1 On Humanness: Weil and Bergson

173

1.2 Attention

174

2. Decreation

175

2.1 Decreation’s Dangers

178

3. Love in Weil’s “Prologue”

179

Conclusion

181

Joseph Prabhu: The Self in Modernity – a Diachronic and Cross-Cultural Critique

182

I. Adventures of Subjectivity from Kant to Nietzsche

183

II. A Tentative Genealogy

189

III. A Non-Dualist Alternative

191

A Concluding Postscript

194

Friederike Rass: The Divine in Modernity: A Theological Tweak on Joseph Prabhu’s Critique of the Modern Self

198

IV. Self and No-Self in Asian Traditions

204

Alexander McKinley: No Self or Ourselves? Wittgenstein and Language Games of Selfhood in a Sinhala Buddhist Form of Life

206

Life Training and Religious Language

206

Anaphors and Selfhood in a Sinhala Buddhist Form of Life

212

Conclusion – We are Buddhists!

218

Jonardon Ganeri: Core Selves and Dynamic Attentional Centering: Between Buddhaghosa and Brian O’Shaughnessy

222

Leah Kalmanson: Like You Mean It: Buddhist Teachings on Selflessness, Sincerity, and the Performative Practice of Liberation

230

Two Examples of the Efficacy of Proper Form

231

Buddhist and Ruist Disagreements over Proper Form

234

Philosophical Context

237

Objections to the Efficacy of Form

238

Further Speculation

241

Fidel Arnecillo Jr.: Worrisome: Implications of a Buddhist View of Selflessness and Moral Action: A Response to Leah Kalmanson

244

Gereon Kopf: Self, Selflessness, and the Endless Search for Identity: A Meta-psychology of Human Folly

250

1. Introduction

250

2. The Key to Identity Politics

251

3. Essentialism: The Metaphysics Underling Identity Politics

253

4. A Blueprint of Non-Essentialism

257

5. A Non-Essentialist Vision of Identity Formation

262

Deena Lin: Probing Identity: Challenging Essentializations of the Self in Ontology. A Response to Gereon Kopf

274

I. Relevance of Drawing from the Concrete

274

II. The “Third”

276

III. A Buddhist Call to Compassion

277

Sinkwan Cheng: Confucius, Aristotle, and a New “Right” to Connect China to Europe – What Concepts of “Self ” and “Right” We Might Have without the Christian Notion of Original Sin

280

Prologue

280

Preliminary Clarifications

282

Main Text

285

1. From Objective Right to Subjective Right: A Brief Semantic History

287

2. Subjective Right and the Christian Doctrines of Original Sin and the Fall

290

3. Right for Aristotle and Confucius, in contrast to Individual-Based Contractual Theory of Justice

292

3.1 Relational Selves

293

3.2 “Right” based on the Notion of Inter-Related Selves

296

3.2.1 Non-Subjective Right – Right being Ad Alterum, or Right as Duty

298

3.2.1.1 Aristotle’s “Right” and the Polis

300

3.2.1.1.1 General Justice

300

3.2.1.1.2 Particular Justice

302

3.2.1.2 Confucius’s “Right” and “Humanity in Grand Togetherness” (??)

303

3.2.1.2.1 Confucius’s Inter-Related Selves

305

3.2.1.2.2 Ren and Inter-Related Selves

306

Conclusion

310

Robert Overy-Brown: Right Translation and Making Right: A Response to Sinkwan Cheng

312

On Modern Liberalism

312

Questioning Original Sin

314

Universally Seeking the Good

316

Constructing Good Ethics

319

Conclusion

320

V. The End of the Self

322

Dietrich Korsch: The “Fragility of the Self ” and the Immortality of the Soul

324

Introduction

324

I. The fragility of the self

324

II. The Immortality of the Soul

327

III. Immortality and Fragility

330

Trevor Kimball: Fragile Immortality: A Response to Dietrich Korsch

334

Yuval Avnur: On Losing Your Self in Your Afterlife

338

1. What matters?

342

2. Our concepts don’t determine what could happen after death (they only determine what we’d call it)

346

3. On the coherence of a selfless afterlife that matters (to me) and defective concepts

355

4. Why are we talking about concepts instead of selves?

358

Duncan Gale: Self-Awareness in the Afterlife: A Response to Yuval Avnur

362

Information about Authors

366

Index of Names

368

Index of Subjects

370